A Masterclass in Empathy and Deception
The New York Times has been criticized for publishing a 5,500-word profile of Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes, with some accusing the paper of being overly empathetic towards her. However, writer Amy Chozick’s piece may provide the most comprehensive understanding yet of how Holmes manipulated investors, business partners, and the media before her eventual downfall.
The Art of Manipulation
Chozick’s profile is a masterclass in empathy and deception. She skillfully weaves together Holmes’ narrative, presenting it as a tale of a brilliant entrepreneur who was misunderstood by the world. However, beneath the surface lies a complex web of deceit and manipulation.
A Cult Leader?
As Chozick delves deeper into Holmes’ story, she notes that her narrative feels like "the story of someone who had finally broken out of a cult and been deprogrammed." This observation is particularly striking given the allegations of misconduct and mistreatment at Theranos. It’s as if Holmes was running a cult, using her charm and charisma to control those around her.
The Power of Belief
One of the most fascinating aspects of Chozick’s profile is her account of how easily people were taken in by Holmes’ charms. Even when faced with evidence of failure and deception, individuals like former Theranos employee Tyler Shultz found themselves believing in Holmes’ vision again after just a few minutes of conversation.
A Pattern of Behavior
This phenomenon is not unique to Shultz or even to those closest to Holmes. Chozick herself notes that it was impossible not to believe her when she was in her presence, and how people were taken in by her charm and charisma. This behavior is a hallmark of cult leaders, who use their power and influence to manipulate others into believing in their cause.
A Profile that Raises More Questions than Answers
Chozick’s profile raises more questions about Holmes’ motivations and actions than it provides answers. While it’s clear that she was a master manipulator, the full extent of her deceit and the harm caused by her actions remains unclear. This ambiguity is perhaps the most striking aspect of the profile, leaving readers to ponder the complexities of human behavior and the dangers of blind faith.
A Cautionary Tale
The Elizabeth Holmes story serves as a cautionary tale about the dangers of blind faith and the importance of critical thinking. It’s a reminder that even the most charismatic leaders can hide behind a facade of charm and charisma, using their influence to manipulate others for their own gain. Chozick’s profile is a must-read for anyone interested in understanding the complexities of human behavior and the dangers of unchecked ambition.
Related Reading
